The short answer
If you take a deposit for an assured shorthold tenancy in England, you have 30 days from the date you receive the money to do two things: protect the deposit in one of the three government-authorised schemes, and serve the prescribed information on the tenant and any relevant person (such as a guarantor or parent who contributed to the deposit). Miss the deadline — or get the prescribed information wrong — and the tenant can claim one to three times the deposit amount in compensation, on top of the deposit itself being returned. You also lose the ability to serve a valid Section 21 notice until the breach is remedied.
This is one of the most frequently litigated areas of UK housing law. Courts have no discretion to extend the 30-day deadline, and small errors in the prescribed information have been held to invalidate the entire process. For a letting agent managing hundreds of tenancies on different start dates, keeping track of each 30-day window and each set of prescribed information is a real operational risk.
What the law actually requires
Deposit protection is governed by sections 212 to 215 of the Housing Act 2004, as amended by the Localism Act 2011 and the Deregulation Act 2015. The rules apply to any assured shorthold tenancy (AST) where a deposit is taken.
For every deposit received on or after 6 April 2012, the landlord — or the agent acting on their behalf — must:
- 1Protect the deposit in one of the three authorised schemes, within 30 days of receipt
- 2Serve the prescribed information on the tenant and any relevant person, within the same 30 days
Both steps must be completed within that window. Protecting the money but failing to serve the prescribed information on time is treated in the same way as not protecting the deposit at all.
The three authorised schemes
Only three schemes are currently authorised to hold tenancy deposits in England and Wales:
Deposit Protection Service (DPS)
The DPS is the largest of the three and offers both custodial and insurance-backed options. Custodial is free for landlords — the scheme holds the money for the duration of the tenancy. Insurance-based requires a fee but lets the landlord keep the cash.
MyDeposits
MyDeposits is insurance-based by default, with a custodial option. It is widely used by letting agents and charges per tenancy.
Tenancy Deposit Scheme (TDS)
TDS offers both custodial (free) and insurance (fee-based) options. It is the oldest of the three schemes and runs a well-established independent adjudication service.
All three schemes meet the statutory requirements — the choice between them makes no legal difference to your compliance. The decision is practical: custodial schemes are free but you lose use of the money for the tenancy; insurance-based schemes let you keep the deposit in your account but you pay a fee per tenancy.
The 30-day deadline — there is no grace period
The 30-day deadline is calendar days, not working days. It includes weekends and bank holidays. If the 30th day falls on a Sunday, the deadline is still that Sunday.
The deadline runs from the date you receive the deposit — not the date the tenancy starts. If the tenant pays the deposit on 1 March and the tenancy begins on 15 March, the deadline is 30 March, not 14 April.
Three failure modes are common:
- Holding the money in a client account and forgetting to protect it. "I'll sort it when the tenancy starts" becomes a missed deadline the moment the first weekend passes.
- Instalments. If the tenant pays the deposit in two parts, the 30-day clock starts on the first payment, not the last. Protect each instalment as it is received.
- Holding deposits converting into tenancy deposits. When a holding deposit becomes a tenancy deposit on the tenancy starting, the 30 days runs from that date. Some agents miss this because the money has been sitting in the account for weeks already.
The courts have been consistent: the 30-day deadline is absolute. Late protection does not cure the breach. You either protected within 30 days or you did not.
The prescribed information
Protecting the deposit is only half the job. You must also serve the prescribed information on the tenant and any relevant person within the same 30-day window.
The prescribed information is set out in the Housing (Tenancy Deposits) (Prescribed Information) Order 2007 and must include:
- The amount of the deposit
- The address of the property
- The name, address and contact details of the scheme administrator
- Any information contained in a leaflet supplied by the scheme
- The landlord's name, address and contact details
- The letting agent's name, address and contact details, if one is used
- The tenant's name, address and contact details, including an address the tenant can be contacted at after they leave
- Any relevant person's name, address and contact details — for example, a guarantor or parent who paid the deposit
- The purpose of the deposit
- How to apply for the return of the deposit
- What to do if the landlord or agent cannot be contacted at the end of the tenancy
- What to do if the parties cannot agree on the deposit's return
- The scheme's dispute resolution procedure
- A signed certificate from the landlord (or agent) confirming the information is accurate
The tenant must be given a reasonable opportunity to sign the certificate confirming they have received the information. Each scheme provides a template that covers every field, but the template is only useful if every field is actually completed.
Case law: why small errors matter
Two cases define how strictly the rules are enforced.
Ayannuga v Swindells [2012]
In *Ayannuga v Swindells* [2012] EWCA Civ 1789, the landlord had protected the deposit correctly but the prescribed information was incomplete — it omitted the scheme's information leaflet and some contact details. The Court of Appeal held that the landlord had still breached the rules, and the tenant was entitled to the statutory penalty. Minor errors in the prescribed information count as non-compliance. Every field matters.
Superstrike Ltd v Rodrigues [2013]
In *Superstrike Ltd v Rodrigues* [2013] EWCA Civ 669, the Court of Appeal held that when a fixed-term AST rolled into a statutory periodic tenancy, a new tenancy was created in law and the deposit had to be re-protected and prescribed information re-served. The decision caused widespread non-compliance overnight — thousands of landlords who had protected deposits correctly for the original term had not re-protected them for the periodic continuation.
Parliament intervened through the Deregulation Act 2015, which confirmed that a deposit protected for the original fixed term remains validly protected when the tenancy rolls into a statutory periodic tenancy, provided the prescribed information was served at the start. This restored the pre-*Superstrike* position for ongoing tenancies.
Crucially, this only applies to statutory periodic rollovers. If the landlord and tenant sign a brand new fixed-term agreement at the end of the first term, the safer course is to re-serve the prescribed information for the new term — even if the deposit itself does not need to move.
Penalties for non-compliance
The penalties are set out in section 214 of the Housing Act 2004.
Financial penalty (1x to 3x the deposit)
If the tenant brings a claim, the court must order the landlord to pay the tenant between one and three times the amount of the deposit. The penalty is in addition to returning the deposit itself.
Courts typically award:
- Towards the higher end (2x to 3x) where the failure was prolonged, deliberate, or accompanied by other breaches
- Towards the lower end (1x) where the failure was a genuine administrative oversight that was remedied quickly
For a typical £1,500 deposit, exposure is between £1,500 and £4,500 per tenancy, plus the deposit itself — up to £6,000 per tenancy in total.
Section 21 restriction
You cannot serve a valid Section 21 notice if:
- The deposit was not protected within 30 days of receipt, and
- The deposit has not been returned to the tenant in full, or the tenant has not accepted a settlement
This bar survives even if you later protect the deposit — the historical breach continues to invalidate any Section 21 notice until the deposit is returned or compensation is paid. The Renters' Rights Act 2026 abolishes Section 21 entirely from 1 May 2026, but the deposit protection rules themselves continue to apply to the new assured tenancy regime.
Multiple tenancies, multiple claims
Each tenancy is a separate breach. A letting agent with 20 tenancies where prescribed information was served late could face up to 20 separate claims, each for one to three times the deposit. Claims can be brought at any time during the tenancy, and for up to six years after the tenancy ends under the Limitation Act 1980.
Deposit caps under the Tenant Fees Act 2019
Since 1 June 2019, the Tenant Fees Act 2019 has capped tenancy deposits:
| Annual rent | Maximum deposit |
|---|---|
| Under £50,000 | 5 weeks' rent |
| £50,000 or more | 6 weeks' rent |
Taking a deposit above the cap is a separate offence, carrying a civil penalty of up to £5,000 for a first breach and up to £30,000 — or criminal prosecution — for repeat offences. The excess amount is treated as a prohibited payment that the tenant can recover.
Calculate the cap as: monthly rent × 12 ÷ 52 × 5 (or × 6 for higher-rent tenancies). Round down, not up — the cap is a strict ceiling, and even a £50 overcharge is a breach.
Common mistakes letting agents make
Forgetting to serve prescribed information on the guarantor
If a parent or guarantor paid any part of the deposit — or in some readings, has joint liability for the deposit — they are a "relevant person" and must receive the prescribed information as well as the tenant. Missing them off the distribution list creates the same liability as failing to serve the tenant.
Relying on the scheme's automated emails
Protecting a deposit online triggers an email from the scheme to the tenant. That email is not the prescribed information — it is a scheme notification. You still need to send the full prescribed information set separately, with the signed landlord certificate.
Not re-serving prescribed information on fixed-term renewal
When a tenant signs a new fixed-term agreement at the end of the first term, the safe practice is to re-serve the prescribed information. The deposit itself does not need to move if it stays in the same scheme, but the prescribed information refresh protects against arguments about the new tenancy.
Treating the 30 days as working days
The 30 days is calendar days, running from the date of receipt of the deposit — not the tenancy start date.
Charging over the deposit cap
The cap is calculated down to the day. Even a small overcharge creates a Tenant Fees Act breach on top of any deposit protection issues.
Losing the signed prescribed information certificate
The tenant's signed acknowledgement is the evidence you served the information correctly. Without it, you are relying on memory and email timestamps in a dispute three years later.
What changes under the Renters' Rights Act 2026
The Renters' Rights Act 2026, which commences on 1 May 2026, abolishes fixed-term assured shorthold tenancies in England and converts all existing tenancies to a single form of periodic assured tenancy. Section 21 is abolished at the same time.
The deposit protection rules themselves are not repealed — they continue to apply to the new assured tenancy regime. Two practical changes follow:
- Fewer renewal re-serves. Because there will no longer be new fixed-term agreements every six or twelve months, the issue of re-serving prescribed information on renewal largely disappears for new tenancies starting after 1 May 2026.
- Section 21 restriction becomes moot. Section 21 is abolished, but Section 8 possession grounds continue to apply. Deposit protection does not directly affect Section 8, so the main practical consequence of a deposit breach after 1 May 2026 will be the 1x to 3x penalty claim, not an eviction bar.
Existing fixed-term tenancies will convert to periodic tenancies automatically on 1 May 2026. Deposits protected for those tenancies remain validly protected under the Deregulation Act 2015 principle — but the transition is a useful prompt to audit your portfolio and confirm every deposit is correctly protected and every set of prescribed information is on file.
Tracking deposits across a portfolio
For a letting agent managing 50, 100, or 500 tenancies, the operational problem with deposit protection is not understanding the rules — it is making sure every tenancy has:
- The deposit protected in a scheme within 30 days of receipt
- The prescribed information served on the tenant and any relevant person within 30 days
- Evidence (scheme certificate and signed prescribed information) stored against the tenancy
- A refresh of the prescribed information for any new fixed-term renewal before 1 May 2026
Each tenancy starts on its own date. The 30-day window is different for every one. A single new tenancy that slips through the cracks can cost the landlord — or the agent, if they mis-handled the deposit — up to three times the deposit plus the deposit itself. A £1,500 deposit becomes a £6,000 liability.
The failure mode is almost always administrative: a tenancy logged in the CRM but not flagged for protection, a prescribed information pack never signed, a guarantor who was missed off the distribution list, a renewal where prescribed information was assumed to carry over. The council and the court do not care why — the breach is the same.
How Proplio helps
Proplio tracks the deposit protection deadline for every tenancy in your portfolio alongside your other compliance dates. For each tenancy you can record:
- The date the deposit was received
- The scheme it was protected in and the certificate reference
- The date the prescribed information was served
- The relevant persons served (tenant, guarantors, co-tenants)
- The scheme certificate and signed prescribed information as stored documents
Every tenancy is colour-coded against its 30-day deadline, and automatic email reminders fire before the window closes. For letting agents, this gives portfolio-wide visibility — one dashboard showing every tenancy where the deposit still needs to be protected or where the prescribed information is outstanding.
Key takeaways
- You have 30 calendar days from the date you receive a deposit to protect it in an authorised scheme and serve prescribed information on the tenant and any relevant person
- The deadline is absolute — courts have no discretion to extend it
- The penalty is one to three times the deposit, plus the deposit itself, per tenancy
- You cannot serve a valid Section 21 notice while the deposit is unprotected or prescribed information is outstanding (until Section 21 is abolished on 1 May 2026)
- Prescribed information must be complete — minor errors have been held to invalidate the whole process
- Guarantors who contribute to the deposit must also receive the prescribed information
- The Deregulation Act 2015 means deposits protected for a fixed-term AST remain protected when the tenancy rolls into a statutory periodic tenancy, provided prescribed information was served at the start
- The Tenant Fees Act 2019 caps deposits at 5 weeks' rent (or 6 weeks' if annual rent is £50,000 or more)
- Claims can be brought during the tenancy and for six years after it ends
- Letting agents managing multiple tenancies need a systematic way to track the 30-day window for every new tenancy
Related guides on Proplio:
- Every fine a UK landlord can face in 2026
- The Renters' Rights Act 2026 compliance checklist
- Switching letting agent: the compliance handover
- Best compliance tracking software for letting agents and landlords
*This article is for general guidance and applies to England and Wales. Tenancy deposit protection operates under different legislation in Scotland (Tenancy Deposit Schemes (Scotland) Regulations 2011) and Northern Ireland (Tenancy Deposit Schemes Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2012). Always check current scheme rules and seek legal advice for specific disputes.*